|
In this issue: Welcome to our February issue of webRED In January we wrapped up 2005 with reviews of the of the Year of Search, so this month we are looking ahead at the new Search World trends for 2006, how search is shaping our everyday lives and what trends we will be noticing in consumer behaviour this year! In Search World Highlights we will be looking at a new search engine to hit the internet world – Mojeek. We tell you how it differs from other engines and explain its advanced and personalized search options. We also cover the well publicized Google China Search issue, with an article from Reuters explaining the situation as well as Google’s view on the issue. Our Frequently Asked Question is going to cover HTML codes – what they are, why they are important and how you can check the validity of your HTML code. I hope everyone has a wonderful month and if there are any questions you would like answered or would like to boost your online advertising campaign, feel free to contact us. Until next month Back to top >> Here are five trends in consumer generated content that are predicted to have a profound impact on our internet experience in 2006 and beyond: 1. Social networking comes of age 2. Wikipedia becomes the number one reference site 3. Flickr and tagging take off 4. Blogs, blogs, blogs 5. Video search goes viral Source: iMediaConnection.com New Search Engine : Mojeek Mojeek.com is a new search engine (still in beta), with an independent crawler. This newcomer in such an extremely competitive market combines simplicity with advanced search options and personalized search. Uncluttered and advanced Advanced Search Personal Search At present, you can choose between five algorithms – default, 1, 2, 3, and 4. If the categories had been descriptive, for instance information, shopping, education or travel, this would have been a truly interesting feature. More to come This feature would also benefit site owners and webmasters wishing to implement site searches and multiple domain searches, using their own customized ranking parameters, a feature which, to our knowledge, no other engine offers. Source: BBC Google to sensor sensitive terms in China As you may have heard by now, Google has agreed to block politically sensitive terms on its new China site, bowing to conditions set by Beijing in return for access to the world's second highest Internet market. The voluntary concessions laid out on Tuesday by Google, which is launching a China-based search site as it officially enters the market, would parallel similar self-censorship already practised there by most multinationals and domestic players. Homegrown giants like Sohu.com Inc. and Baidu.com Inc., along with China sites operated by Yahoo Inc. and Microsoft, all routinely block searches on politically sensitive terms such as the Falun Gong spiritual movement and Taiwan independence. “In order to operate from China, we have removed some content from the search results available on Google.cn in response to local law, regulation or policy," Andrew McLaughlin, Google's senior policy counsel, said in a statement: "While removing search results is inconsistent with Google's mission, providing no information (or a heavily degraded user experience that amounts to no information) is more inconsistent with our mission." Google, known for its "Don't do evil" mantra, is developing its China approach as it seeks to strike a balance between the freedom of information it champions and the censorship demanded by Beijing, which controls access to China's 111 million Internet users. The company added that at least for now, it will stay away from e-mail and blogging in China, which have been the source of recent controversies after Beijing demanded information on an e-mail user from Yahoo, and Microsoft pulled down a politically sensitive posting from its China-based blog service. Google said it will also stay away from chat rooms, another popular form of expression over the Internet. Source: Reuters.co.uk On the flip side of the coin, this is Google’s view on the China search issue (written by Google’s Blog editor): “There has been controversy about our new Google News China edition, specifically regarding which news sources we include. For users inside the People's Republic of China, we have chosen not to include sources that are inaccessible from within that country. This was a difficult decision for Google, and we would like to share the factors we considered before taking this course of action. Google is committed to providing easy access to as much information as possible. For Internet users in China, Google remains the only major search engine that does not censor any web pages. However, it's clear that search results deemed to be sensitive for political or other reasons are inaccessible within China. There is nothing Google can do about this. For last week's launch of the Chinese-language edition of Google News, we had to decide whether sources that cannot be viewed in China should be included for Google News users inside the PRC. Naturally, we want to present as broad a range of news sources as possible. For every edition of Google News, in every language, we attempt to select news sources without regard to political viewpoint or ideology. For Internet users in China, we had to consider the fact that some sources are entirely blocked. Leaving aside the politics, that presents us with a serious user experience problem. Google News does not show news stories, but rather links to news stories. So links to stories published by blocked news sources would not work for users inside the PRC -- if they clicked on a headline from a blocked source, they would get an error page. It is possible that there would be some small user value to just seeing the headlines. However, simply showing these headlines would likely resu! lt in Google News being blocked altogether in China. We also considered the amount of information that would be omitted. In this case it is less than two percent of Chinese news sources. On balance we believe that having a service with links that work and omits a fractional number is better than having a service that is not available at all. It was a difficult tradeoff for us to make, but the one we felt ultimately serves the best interests of our users located in China” Source: googleblog.blogspot.com Back to top >> Question: Answer: As you may have heard in the media, the German websites of car maker BMW have been kicked out of the Google index. At this time, www.bmw.de has a PageRank of 0. The reason for the ban is because the BMW websites have been caught employing that dirty SEO technique of doorway pages. In a nut-shell, Google’s guidelines go back to one of our single philosophies: optimiser’s should optimize for humans, not machines, because the search engines don’t like to be cheated. The irony here is that BMW.de is now a highly inaccessible site right from the front-page: a JavaScript-only navigation prevents access by certain browsers, browser settings or media (such as handheld browsers), and it also prevents search bots from effectively crawling the site. This story just stresses one of our values here at Optymise: we employ proper techniques that helps a website sell itself with quality, substantial content, rather than covering up smaller errors with even bigger ones (such as BMW Germany)! Source: SEO Logic
All views expressed are those of Optymise Ltd and articles/ features are written by Optymise staff unless otherwise stated.
|